They expertly mapped the overlapping controls between SOC 2 and ISO 27001, which saved us from duplicating work.
The SOC 2 Security category — implemented through the nine Common Criteria CC1–CC9 — is the mandatory foundation of every SOC 2 examination, requiring an organization to protect its systems and data against unauthorized access, disclosure, and damage.
The Common Criteria are mandatory in every SOC 2 report — the other four categories are optional add-ons chosen by customer demand.
AICPA Trust Services Criteria · SSAE 18 attestation · Last reviewed June 2026
Are the Security criteria mandatory?
The SOC 2 Security criterion — implemented through the Common Criteria CC1–CC9 — is the mandatory foundation of every SOC 2 examination, requiring an organization to protect its systems and data against unauthorized access, disclosure, and damage. Defined by the AICPA (aicpa-cima.com), it is the only one of the five Trust Services Criteria included in every report, whereas Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy are optional add-ons chosen by customer demand. SOC 2 itself is an SSAE 18 attestation performed by a licensed CPA — an independent opinion, not a certificate.
Key Takeaways
- Security is the only mandatory Trust Services Criteria — it appears in every SOC 2 report. The other four categories are optional.
- Security is implemented through the nine Common Criteria CC1–CC9, with CC1–CC5 mapping to the COSO internal-control framework.
- SOC 2 is an AICPA SSAE 18 attestation issued by a licensed CPA, not a certification — the deliverable is an independent report (Type 1 or Type 2).
- Most teams are audit-ready in 6–8 weeks. Tranquility Cybersecurity delivers SOC 2 at an indicative ₹2–3L (Type 1) to ₹3–5L (Type 2), all-in, across 300+ SOC 2 engagements.
What is the SOC 2 Security criteria?
Security criteria (Common Criteria CC1–CC9) are the mandatory foundation of every SOC 2 audit. Unlike the other Trust Services Criteria (Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) which are optional, Security is always required.
These nine criteria establish the baseline security controls that protect your systems and data. They cover everything from organizational culture (CC1) to disaster recovery (CC9).
- Mandatory for All SOC 2 Reports Every SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 report must include Security criteria
- 9 Common Criteria (CC1–CC9) Comprehensive framework covering all aspects of security controls
- Based on the COSO Framework Aligned with the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) internal control framework
- Auditor Will Test Each Criterion Your CPA auditor will evaluate evidence for all 9 criteria during the audit
Why Security Criteria Matter
Fortune 500 companies require SOC 2 Security criteria compliance
Demonstrates a systematic approach to security risk management
Independent CPA verification builds confidence with customers
Win deals against competitors without SOC 2 compliance
The 9 Common Criteria (CC1–CC9)
Each criterion addresses a specific aspect of security controls. Your auditor will test all nine during the SOC 2 examination.
Control Environment
The entity demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values.
- Tone at the top - leadership sets security culture
- Code of conduct and ethics policies
- Organizational structure with clear roles
- Commitment to competence and training
- Accountability mechanisms and enforcement
Communication and Information
The entity obtains or generates and uses relevant, quality information to support the functioning of internal control.
- Security policies communicated to all employees
- Incident reporting channels established
- Regular security awareness training
- Documentation of security procedures
- Stakeholder communication protocols
Risk Assessment
The entity identifies risks to the achievement of its objectives across the entity and analyzes risks as a basis for determining how the risks should be managed.
- Formal risk assessment process
- Identification of threats and vulnerabilities
- Risk scoring and prioritization
- Risk treatment plans and mitigation
- Regular risk reassessment (at least annually)
Monitoring Activities
The entity selects, develops, and performs ongoing and/or separate evaluations to ascertain whether the components of internal control are present and functioning.
- Continuous monitoring of security controls
- Log review and analysis
- Security metrics and KPIs
- Internal audits and assessments
- Management review of control effectiveness
Control Activities
The entity selects and develops control activities that contribute to the mitigation of risks to the achievement of objectives to acceptable levels.
- Policies and procedures documented
- Segregation of duties
- Authorization and approval workflows
- Physical and environmental controls
- Vendor and third-party management
Logical and Physical Access Controls
The entity implements logical access security software, infrastructure, and architectures over protected information assets to protect them from security events.
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) required
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Least privilege principle enforced
- Access reviews (quarterly recommended)
- Physical security controls for data centers
System Operations
The entity manages the system to support the achievement of the entity's objectives, including the use of system components.
- Capacity planning and performance monitoring
- Backup and recovery procedures
- Disaster recovery and business continuity
- System availability monitoring
- Incident response procedures
Change Management
The entity authorizes, designs, develops or acquires, configures, documents, tests, approves, and implements changes to infrastructure, data, software, and procedures.
- Formal change management process
- Change approval workflows
- Testing in non-production environments
- Rollback procedures documented
- Change documentation and tracking
Risk Mitigation
The entity identifies, selects, and develops risk mitigation activities for risks arising from potential business disruptions.
- Business impact analysis (BIA)
- Disaster recovery plan (DRP)
- Business continuity plan (BCP)
- Regular testing of recovery procedures
- Incident response and crisis management
How to Implement the Security Criteria
Documentation Requirements
- Security policies: Information Security Policy, Acceptable Use Policy, Access Control Policy
- Risk assessment: Annual risk assessment with threat identification and mitigation plans
- Procedures: Incident response, change management, backup/recovery procedures
- Evidence: Access reviews, security training records, monitoring logs
Technical Controls
- MFA everywhere: Multi-factor authentication for all production systems and admin access
- RBAC: Role-based access control with least privilege principle
- Logging: Centralized logging with retention (1 year minimum recommended)
- Encryption: Data encryption at rest and in transit (TLS 1.2+)
Organizational Controls
- Security training: Annual security awareness training for all employees
- Background checks: Pre-employment screening for employees with system access
- Vendor management: Security assessments for third-party vendors
- Incident response: Documented IR plan with defined roles and escalation
Operational Controls
- Change management: Formal approval process for production changes
- Backups: Automated daily backups with quarterly restore testing
- Monitoring: 24/7 system monitoring with alerting for security events
- Disaster recovery: DR plan with RTO/RPO defined and tested annually
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The patterns we see derail SOC 2 examinations — and how we keep your Common Criteria evidence clean the first time.
Incomplete documentation
Missing policies, procedures, or evidence will cause audit delays or outright failures.
Fix: Build a comprehensive documentation library before the audit starts, using templates to ensure completeness.
No MFA on critical systems
Single-factor authentication is a common audit finding and a real security risk.
Fix: Implement MFA on all production systems, admin panels, and cloud infrastructure before the observation period.
Infrequent access reviews
Not reviewing user access quarterly leads to privilege creep and audit findings.
Fix: Schedule quarterly access reviews with documented approval from system owners.
Untested disaster recovery
Having a DR plan without testing it is insufficient for SOC 2 compliance.
Fix: Test disaster-recovery procedures at least annually with documented results.
No change-management process
Deploying production changes without approval or testing is a critical finding.
Fix: Implement formal change management with approval workflows and testing requirements.
Insufficient logging
Not logging security events, or retaining logs for too short a period.
Fix: Implement centralized logging with a one-year retention minimum across authentication, authorization, and system changes.
In their words.
Quotes verbatim from G2. Company names added where the client confirmed them.
Instead of simply providing generic templates or checklists, their team took the time to understand our environment and requirements.
The team’s willingness to work with us and ease of communication.
They delivered the project with speed, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness.
My only regret is that we didn’t engage them sooner in our compliance journey, which would have saved us even more time.
They were always responsive and willing to go the extra mile whenever we had questions or needed guidance.
Managing the auditor relationship on our behalf was especially valuable — it took a lot of pressure off our internal team.
Their focus on ensuring that we were genuinely audit-ready rather than simply completing documentation.
The guidance was not generic or simply based on a standard checklist — they suggested practical approaches that made sense for our business.
What I like best is the hands-on support and clear guidance throughout the SOC 1 and SOC 2 process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions on the SOC 2 Security category and the Common Criteria CC1–CC9.
Are the Security / Common Criteria mandatory for every SOC 2 report?
What are the 9 Common Criteria (CC1–CC9)?
Is SOC 2 a certification?
How long does it take to implement the Security criteria controls?
What evidence will the auditor request for the Security criteria?
Continue your SOC 2 research
- SOC 2 compliance hub — Trust Services Criteria, Type 1 vs Type 2, timelines, and costs in one place.
- SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria — all five categories, the common criteria every report includes, and how to choose what goes in scope.
- SOC 2 controls list — illustrative controls for CC1–CC9, since the AICPA publishes criteria, not controls.
- SOC 2 consulting for Indian companies — readiness through attestation at an indicative ₹2–5L, all-in.
- Tranquility Cybersecurity credentials & proof — 300+ SOC 2 engagements to date.
Related Reading
Trust Services Criteria
Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy.
Read moreSOC 2 Controls List
No official list exists — illustrative controls by criteria series (CC1–CC9).
Read moreTSC: Availability
Uptime SLAs, monitoring and incident response criteria.
Read moreTSC: Confidentiality
Data classification, encryption and access control criteria.
Read moreSOC 2 Knowledge Hub
Type 1 vs Type 2, criteria, timelines and audit prep — all guides.
Read moreAnnex A Controls Overview
All 93 controls across organizational, people, physical and tech domains.
Read moreGo deeper.
The SOC 2 Controls List
The control families behind the criteria, with examples.
Read moreChoosing Trust Services Criteria
Which of the five categories belong in your report, and why.
Read moreConfidentiality vs Privacy
Two criteria teams conflate — and the different evidence each needs.
Read more


