SOC 2 for Logistics
SOC 2 for Logistics
& Supply Chain
SOC 2 is the independent attestation logistics and supply-chain platforms use to prove their security, availability, and confidentiality controls to the enterprise shippers, retailers, and 3PLs whose operations they integrate with. For logistics SaaS, TMS, freight, and last-mile platforms it is the fastest way to close a vendor assessment — and increasingly a hard gate on the integration itself.
TCSA has delivered 250+ SOC 2 attestations across 500+ audits in India, USA, UK, Australia and UAE to date. Consulting is ₹2–4 Lakh (indicative), in 10–16 weeks, with CPA attestation fees billed separately.
AICPA Attestation Framework · Licensed CPA Firm Network · Serving India, USA, UK & GCC
The Drivers
Why Logistics Platforms Need SOC 2
For a logistics or supply-chain platform, deep integration with client systems is the business — and the liability. Four forces push these platforms toward SOC 2, and each one is satisfied by the same report.
Enterprise shipper & 3PL onboarding
Before a large shipper, retailer, or 3PL connects your platform to its operations, its third-party risk team runs a vendor assessment. A SOC 2 Type II report is the document that closes that review without a 200-question security questionnaire — and increasingly it is a hard gate on the integration and the contract itself.
Deep ERP/WMS integration
You exchange order, inventory, and shipment data with your clients’ core ERP and WMS systems over EDI and APIs. That integration surface is the single largest risk a client takes on, and SOC 2 is how you evidence the access, change, and monitoring controls that keep every connection contained.
Shipment, rate & customer data
Pricing, routes, consignee details, and proof-of-delivery records are commercially sensitive and often personal. A SOC 2 report proves the classification, encryption, and controlled-disclosure controls that protect that data across every shipper and carrier you serve.
24/7 operational availability
Supply chains never stop. Tracking, dispatch, and EDI exchanges carry strict uptime expectations, and SOC 2 is how you evidence the monitoring, capacity, and disaster-recovery controls that keep freight moving through peak season.
SOC 2 reports are issued under the AICPA Trust Services Criteria. For a logistics platform serving regulated shippers, those criteria also help evidence the access and monitoring controls your clients must demonstrate to their own auditors and supply-chain risk teams.
Trust Services Criteria
Which Criteria Matter Most for a Logistics Platform
Security is mandatory; the rest are scoped to what your shipper and carrier contracts demand. Here is how an auditor weighs each criterion for a logistics and supply-chain platform.
| Trust Services Criterion | Priority for Logistics Platforms | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Security (Common Criteria) | Mandatory | The baseline in every SOC 2 report. For a logistics platform this is where access management across the EDI/integration layer, MFA, hardening, patching, and centralised logging are tested — the controls an enterprise shipper scrutinises first. |
| Availability | Strongly recommended | Logistics platforms run 24/7 operations, tracking, and dispatch under uptime expectations. Availability evidences monitoring, capacity planning, and disaster recovery so a tracking or EDI outage is contained — even during peak freight seasons. |
| Confidentiality | Strongly recommended | You hold shipper rates, routes, and other commercial data that competitors and counterparties must never see. This criterion proves classification, encryption, and controlled disclosure across every shipper and carrier on the platform. |
| Processing Integrity | Strongly recommended | Shipment status, inventory counts, and billing must be complete, valid, accurate, timely, and authorised. This criterion tests that the data you move and the charges you raise are right — the difference a client notices immediately when it is wrong. |
| Privacy | Situational | Add when you process consignee and recipient personal data — names, addresses, and contact details — and where it dovetails with India’s DPDP Act obligations as a data processor. |
Timeline & Cost
Type I vs Type II for Logistics Platforms
Consulting fee bands for TCSA-led SOC 2 engagements. The CPA firm’s attestation fee is quoted separately by the audit firm.
| Attestation | Timeline | Best for | Consulting Fee | CPA Attestation Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type I | 10–12 weeks | A point-in-time report to unblock an enterprise-shipper onboarding or RFP quickly | ₹2–4 Lakh | Billed separately by the CPA firm (indicative) |
| SOC 2 Type II | 14–16 weeks, plus a 3–12 month observation window | The report most enterprise shippers and 3PLs ultimately require — controls tested over time | ₹2–4 Lakh | Billed separately by the CPA firm (indicative) |
Fee bands are indicative and confirmed after a scoping call. CPA attestation fees vary with Trust Services Criteria, integration count, and report type.
What You Receive
Logistics SOC 2 Deliverables
From the Audit Floor
Common Logistics SOC 2 Mistakes
The patterns we see derail logistics-platform engagements — and how we keep your report clean the first time.
Scoping to the customer-facing portal, not the integration and tracking backend
Logistics platforms often scope SOC 2 around the shipper portal instead of the EDI/integration layer and tracking backend that enterprise shippers actually assess. We scope the system description to the components through which you exchange data with client ERP and WMS systems, because that is the boundary a client’s risk team cares about.
Weak controls around EDI/API integrations
The connections into your clients’ ERP and WMS systems carry your highest-risk data flows, yet access, change, and monitoring controls around them are often the thinnest. We harden and evidence the integration layer first, because that is where an auditor — and an enterprise shipper — looks hardest.
Under-scoping Availability and DR for 24/7 operations
Supply chains do not pause, and peak freight seasons multiply load. Treating Availability lightly — thin monitoring, untested disaster recovery, no capacity planning — produces exceptions the moment volumes spike. We scope Availability and DR to the round-the-clock reality of logistics operations.
Missing CUECs and uncarved subservice organisations
A logistics platform sits on cloud infrastructure and telematics/mapping vendors, and integrates deeply with client systems. Failing to document complementary user-entity controls for shipper and carrier integrations — or to carve out those subservice organisations — produces a report an auditor cannot sign cleanly. We map the chain explicitly.
Starting Type II observation before the integration estate runs consistently
The Type II window tests controls over time. Beginning observation before access reviews, change management, and monitoring run consistently across every integration guarantees exceptions. We confirm every control is operating across the integration estate before the clock starts.
“For a logistics platform, the SOC 2 report is read by the risk team of every enterprise shipper you want to onboard. We scope the system description to the integration path — the EDI layer, the tracking backend, the shipment-data stores — and prove the access, change, and monitoring controls those reviewers test first.”
“SOC 2 Services were excellent.” — Anand Singh, verified Google review
SOC 2 for Logistics — Frequently Asked Questions
Straight answers from the team that has delivered 250+ SOC 2 attestations to date.
We mainly move data between systems — why do we need SOC 2?
Because moving the data means you sit on it: your clients’ operational and commercial records — orders, inventory, rates, routes, and consignee details — pass through and rest on your platform. A large shipper’s risk team needs independent assurance that your access, change, and monitoring controls actually operate before it connects you to its ERP or WMS. A SOC 2 Type II report provides that, and buyers increasingly require it as a hard gate before any integration. We scope the report to the integration and tracking layer your clients assess so it answers their questions directly.
Which Trust Services Criteria should a logistics platform include?
Security (the Common Criteria) is mandatory in every SOC 2 report. For a logistics or supply-chain platform we almost always add Availability, Confidentiality, and Processing Integrity — because you run 24/7 operations, hold commercially sensitive shipper rates and routes, and your shipment status, inventory counts, and billing must be accurate. Privacy is added where you process consignee personal data. Over-scoping inflates both consulting effort and the CPA fee, so we map criteria to what your shipper and carrier contracts actually demand.
Should a logistics platform start with SOC 2 Type I or Type II?
Most start with Type I to put a report in an enterprise shipper or prospect’s hands quickly — it attests that controls are designed correctly at a point in time, in roughly 10–12 weeks. You then roll straight into the Type II observation window, which tests that those controls operate effectively over 3–12 months. Because enterprise shippers and 3PLs usually require Type II, we scope the observation period up front and aim for the fastest path to your onboarding or RFP deadline.
How long does SOC 2 take for a logistics platform, and what does it cost?
Plan on 10–16 weeks of consulting work: Type I in 10–12 weeks, Type II in 14–16 weeks plus its observation window. TCSA’s consulting fee is ₹2–4 Lakh (indicative until a scoping call), covering scoping, gap assessment, control design, policy drafting, evidence preparation, and audit coordination. The CPA firm’s attestation fee is billed separately and varies with the Trust Services Criteria and the number of systems and integrations in scope.
Will SOC 2 close an enterprise shipper’s onboarding review?
For most enterprise shippers and 3PLs, a clean SOC 2 Type II report is exactly what their third-party risk process is asking for — it lets them rely on a licensed CPA’s testing instead of running a long questionnaire against your integration and tracking layer. It does not replace contract-specific security terms, but it removes the largest obstacle and usually shortens onboarding from months to weeks. We scope the report to the components those reviewers assess so it lands as the answer to their assessment.
We run on AWS and integrate via EDI/APIs with client ERP/WMS — can we still get SOC 2?
Yes, and it usually makes the audit cleaner, because AWS and most major cloud and telematics/mapping vendors already hold their own SOC reports. You inherit their controls and focus on what you operate — access management, change control, logging, and monitoring across the EDI/API integration estate. We carve out those subservice organisations and document the complementary user-entity controls for your shipper and carrier integrations, so the shared-responsibility boundary is explicit and the auditor finds no gaps.
Keep Exploring
Related Reading
SOC 2 Knowledge Hub
Type 1 vs Type 2, criteria, timelines and audit prep — all guides.
Read moreSOC 2 for SaaS
Scoping SOC 2 the way SaaS buyers and their security teams expect.
Read moreSOC 2 for E-commerce
Payment-partner reviews, order integrity, and peak-season availability.
Read moreSOC 2 Consulting in India
Auditor-led SOC 2 readiness and CPA coordination for Indian teams.
Read moreISO 27001 Overview
The ISMS standard — the baseline certificate global buyers ask for.
Read moreProof & Track Record
Every number we publish — explained, sourced and verifiable.
Read moreWritten By Expert Auditors
Get Started
Ready to Onboard Your Next
Enterprise Shipper?
Get SOC 2 attested with a report scoped to the integration and 24/7 operational controls your enterprise shippers actually test. Start with a scoping call.
AICPA SOC 2 Attestation Framework · Serving India, USA, UK & GCC
Get in touch
Book a free consultation or send us your requirements. We respond within 24 hours.
Quick Call
Pick a time slot
Send Requirements
Get a custom quote in 24 hours