Skip to main contentChat with us

SOC 2 for Fintech Companies

SOC 2 for Fintech
Companies

SOC 2 is the independent attestation fintechs use to prove their security, availability, and confidentiality controls to sponsor banks, regulated partners, and enterprise buyers. For payments, lending, and KYC-infrastructure companies it is the fastest way to close a vendor assessment without a 200-question security questionnaire.

TCSA has delivered 250+ SOC 2 attestations to date. Consulting is ₹2–4 Lakh (indicative), in 10–16 weeks, with CPA attestation fees billed separately.

250+SOC 2 attestations
100+SOC 1 reports
10–16Weeks to attestation
India, USA, UK, Australia & UAECountries served

AICPA Attestation Framework  ·  Licensed CPA Firm Network  ·  Serving India, USA, UK & GCC

The Drivers

Why Fintech Companies Need SOC 2

In fintech, trust is the product. Four forces push fintechs toward SOC 2 earlier than almost any other sector — and each one is satisfied by the same report.

Sponsor banks & BIN sponsors

Before a bank, card network, or BIN sponsor lets you touch their rails, their third-party risk team runs a vendor assessment. A SOC 2 Type II report is the document that closes that review without a 200-question security questionnaire.

RBI-regulated partners

When you serve regulated entities, their outsourcing and IT-governance obligations flow down to you. A clean SOC 2 report demonstrates the access controls, change management, and incident response a regulated counterparty must evidence to its own supervisor.

Cardholder & payment data

Fintechs that store, process, or transmit cardholder data sit alongside PCI DSS. SOC 2 does not replace PCI, but it proves the surrounding control environment — logging, monitoring, vendor management — that auditors and partners expect to see.

Enterprise & embedded-finance procurement

Whether you sell lending-as-a-service, payouts, or KYC infrastructure, your enterprise buyers gate procurement on SOC 2. A report shortens the sales cycle and removes the single largest objection in security review.

SOC 2 reports are issued under the AICPA Trust Services Criteria. Where your fintech serves regulated counterparties, those criteria complement obligations under the Reserve Bank of India and, for cardholder data, the PCI DSS standard.

Trust Services Criteria

Which Criteria Matter Most for Fintech

Security is mandatory; the rest are scoped to what your contracts demand. Here is how an auditor weighs each criterion for a fintech.

Trust Services CriterionPriority for FintechWhy it matters
Security (Common Criteria)MandatoryThe baseline in every SOC 2 report. For fintech this is where access control, MFA, encryption, vulnerability management, and logging are tested — the controls a sponsor bank scrutinises first.
AvailabilityStrongly recommendedPayment and lending platforms carry uptime SLAs. Availability evidences monitoring, incident response, capacity planning, and disaster recovery so a settlement window is never missed.
ConfidentialityStrongly recommendedFinancial data, KYC documents, and partner data are confidential by contract. This criterion proves classification, encryption, and controlled disclosure across the data lifecycle.
Processing IntegritySituationalDirectly relevant when you move money or compute balances. It tests that transactions are complete, valid, accurate, timely, and authorised — the heart of a payments engine.
PrivacySituationalAdd when you handle large volumes of personal financial data and need to show notice, choice, and consent — and where it dovetails with India’s DPDP Act obligations.

Timeline & Cost

Type I vs Type II for Fintech

Consulting fee bands for TCSA-led SOC 2 engagements. The CPA firm’s attestation fee is quoted separately by the audit firm.

AttestationTimelineBest forConsulting FeeCPA Attestation Fee
SOC 2 Type I10–12 weeksA point-in-time report to unblock a sponsor-bank review or enterprise deal quickly₹2–4 LakhBilled separately by the CPA firm (indicative)
SOC 2 Type II14–16 weeks, plus a 3–12 month observation windowThe report most banks and enterprise buyers ultimately require — controls tested over time₹2–4 LakhBilled separately by the CPA firm (indicative)

Fee bands are indicative and confirmed after a scoping call. CPA attestation fees vary with Trust Services Criteria, system count, and report type.

What You Receive

Fintech SOC 2 Deliverables

SOC 2 Type I or Type II attestation report, issued by a licensed CPA firm
System description scoped to your payment, lending, or KYC architecture
Trust Services Criteria selection mapped to sponsor-bank and enterprise contracts
Information-security, change-management, and incident-response policy suite
Control matrix mapping each criterion to evidence and owners
Evidence tracker and an audit-defence walkthrough for auditor testing

From the Audit Floor

Common Fintech SOC 2 Mistakes

The patterns we see derail fintech engagements — and how we keep your report clean the first time.

Scoping the report to the wrong system

Fintechs often scope SOC 2 around a marketing site or internal tool, not the money-movement platform the sponsor bank actually assesses. We scope the system description to the components that carry transactions, customer funds, and KYC data — the boundary an auditor and a counterparty care about.

Treating SOC 2 as a substitute for PCI DSS or RBI obligations

SOC 2 is an attestation of your control environment, not a payment-card certification or a regulatory licence. We map where SOC 2, PCI DSS, and your regulated-partner obligations overlap, so you evidence each without duplicating effort or assuming one covers another.

Starting Type II observation with controls that are not yet operating

The Type II window tests controls over time. Beginning observation before access reviews, change tickets, and log monitoring run consistently guarantees exceptions. We confirm every control is operating before the clock starts.

Ignoring complementary user-entity and subservice controls

Most fintechs run on AWS, GCP, and third-party processors. Failing to document complementary user-entity controls (CUECs) and carve-out subservice organisations leaves gaps an auditor will flag. We document the shared-responsibility boundary explicitly.

Under-resourcing evidence collection

Engineering teams shipping daily cannot manually screenshot every control. We set an evidence cadence — and integrate with automation platforms where useful — so the observation window produces a clean, complete trail without derailing the roadmap.

“For a fintech, the SOC 2 report is read by a sponsor bank’s risk team, not just a procurement analyst. We scope the system description to the money-movement path and prove the access, change, and monitoring controls those reviewers test first — which is why our fintech clients pass on the first attempt.”
Surendra Pal SinghCISO & DPO, TCSA — CISA, ISO 27001 / 27701 / 42001 Lead Auditor

“SOC 2 Services were excellent.” — Anand Singh, verified Google review

SOC 2 for Fintech — Frequently Asked Questions

Straight answers from the team that has delivered 250+ SOC 2 attestations to date.

Does a fintech need SOC 2 if it already follows RBI guidelines or holds a PCI DSS certificate?

Yes — they answer different questions. RBI guidance governs your conduct as a regulated or partnered entity, and PCI DSS certifies how you handle cardholder data. SOC 2 is an independent attestation of your overall control environment — security, availability, confidentiality — that sponsor banks and enterprise buyers request to close their own third-party risk reviews. Most fintechs need SOC 2 alongside, not instead of, these frameworks. We map the overlaps so you evidence each efficiently.

Which Trust Services Criteria should a fintech include?

Security (the Common Criteria) is mandatory in every SOC 2 report. For fintech we almost always add Availability and Confidentiality, because payment platforms carry uptime SLAs and handle confidential financial and KYC data. If you move money or compute balances, Processing Integrity becomes important; Privacy is added where you process large volumes of personal financial data. Over-scoping inflates both consulting effort and the CPA fee, so we map criteria to what your contracts actually demand.

Should a fintech start with SOC 2 Type I or Type II?

Most start with Type I to put a report in a sponsor bank or buyer’s hands quickly — it attests that controls are designed correctly at a point in time, in roughly 10–12 weeks. You then roll straight into the Type II observation window, which tests that those controls operate effectively over 3–12 months. If a counterparty explicitly requires Type II, we scope the observation period up front and aim for the fastest path to your deal.

How long does SOC 2 take for a fintech, and what does it cost?

Plan on 10–16 weeks of consulting work: Type I in 10–12 weeks, Type II in 14–16 weeks plus its observation window. TCSA’s consulting fee is ₹2–4 Lakh (indicative until a scoping call), covering scoping, gap assessment, control design, policy drafting, evidence preparation, and audit coordination. The CPA firm’s attestation fee is billed separately and varies with scope.

Will SOC 2 satisfy a sponsor bank or BIN sponsor’s vendor assessment?

A clean SOC 2 Type II report is the single most effective document for closing a sponsor-bank or BIN-sponsor review, because it lets their risk team rely on an independent CPA’s testing instead of running a long questionnaire. We scope the system description and Trust Services Criteria specifically to the money-movement components your partner assesses, so the report answers their questions directly.

Can a payments or lending startup on AWS or GCP get SOC 2?

Yes, and running on a major cloud usually makes it easier, because AWS and GCP already hold their own SOC reports. You inherit their infrastructure controls and focus on application-level controls — access, change management, logging, encryption. We document the complementary user-entity controls and carve out the subservice organisations so the shared-responsibility boundary is explicit and the auditor finds no gaps.

Written By Expert Auditors

Saundhi Chauhan
Saundhi Chauhan
Lead Auditor
ISO 27001 Lead AuditorISO 27701 Lead Auditor
Surendra Pal Singh
Surendra Pal Singh
Chief Information Security Officer & Data Protection Officer
CISODPOCISAMCSEITILISO 27001 Lead AuditorISO 27701 Lead AuditorISO 42001 Lead Auditor
Last reviewed: June 2026Content verified by certified lead auditors

Get Started

Ready to Pass Your
Sponsor-Bank Review?

Get SOC 2 attested with a report scoped to the controls your bank, BIN sponsor, and enterprise buyers actually test. Start with a scoping call.

AICPA SOC 2 Attestation Framework  ·  Serving India, USA, UK & GCC

Get in touch

Book a free consultation or send us your requirements. We respond within 24 hours.

Quick Call

Pick a time slot

Send Requirements

Get a custom quote in 24 hours

We're Online

⚠️ Business inquiries only. Personal email addresses will be rejected.

24hr Response
Free Consultation
No Obligations