They expertly mapped the overlapping controls between SOC 2 and ISO 27001, which saved us from duplicating work.
The Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) requires the financial entities it regulates — banks, insurers, financing companies, credit bureaus, and licensed payment providers — to implement its Cyber Security Framework at maturity level 3 or higher, alongside its Business Continuity Management Framework. TCSA builds the ISMS and BCMS that satisfy both, mapped to ISO 27001 and ISO 22301, in 10–16 weeks.
TCSA has delivered 1,000+ audits across India, USA, UK, Australia and UAE. Our consultants have prepared ADIB, Mashreq Bank, and AMEX for ISO 22301 in the Middle East. Engagements are fixed-fee — quoted after a short scoping call, in SAR or USD for Gulf engagements.
SAMA CSF & BCM Frameworks · rulebook.sama.gov.sa · Last reviewed June 2026
Key Takeaways
- The SAMA Cyber Security Framework (v1.0, May 2017) is mandatory for all banks, insurance and reinsurance companies, financing companies, and credit bureaus operating in Saudi Arabia, plus the financial market infrastructure — and SAMA-licensed payment providers are supervised against it in practice.
- SAMA measures compliance on a 0–5 maturity model and expects member organisations to operate at level 3 or higher — controls must be defined, approved, implemented, and monitored, not merely documented.
- The SAMA BCM Framework (February 2017) adds business-continuity obligations — BIA, risk assessment, BCP, IT disaster recovery, crisis management, and testing — and is explicitly built on ISO 22301 and ISO 27001.
- Because the CSF itself draws on ISO 27001/27002, NIST, and PCI DSS, building one ISO-aligned ISMS and BCMS satisfies SAMA supervision and earns ISO 27001/22301 certificates from the same body of work.
- TCSA delivers SAMA CSF and BCM readiness in 10–16 weeks, with fixed-quote engagements scoped to your deadlines. Our consultants have prepared ADIB (Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank), Mashreq Bank, and AMEX for ISO 22301 in the Middle East. TCSA is an independent consultancy — we prepare, SAMA supervises.
What the SAMA Cyber Security Framework Requires
Issued in May 2017 (version 1.0) and published on the official SAMA Rulebook, the CSF organises its control objectives and considerations into four domains. It covers every information asset a member organisation holds — electronic, physical, applications, ATMs, storage, premises, and networks — and was built on industry standards including ISO 27001/27002, NIST, ISF, BASEL, and PCI DSS.
| CSF Domain | What it covers | What level 3 looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Cyber Security Leadership & Governance | Cyber security strategy, policy, roles and responsibilities, a cyber security function independent of IT operations, and staff awareness and training. | A board-endorsed strategy and policy suite, an appointed cyber security function (CISO), defined committee structures, and a running awareness programme — all documented, approved, and monitored. |
| Cyber Security Risk Management & Compliance | The cyber security risk-management process, regulatory compliance, periodic reviews and audits, and embedding risk decisions into projects and change. | A formal risk methodology with a maintained risk register, risk treatment plans with owners, compliance monitoring against SAMA requirements, and periodic internal and external reviews. |
| Cyber Security Operations & Technology | Identity and access management, application and infrastructure security, cryptography, change management, vulnerability and patch management, security monitoring, and incident management. | Implemented technical controls with evidence they operate — access reviews, hardening baselines, monitored logs (SOC), tested incident-response procedures, and managed vulnerabilities. |
| Third Party Cyber Security | Contract and vendor management, outsourcing, and cloud computing — the obligations that follow your data into supplier and cloud environments. | Cyber security requirements embedded in contracts, due-diligence and periodic review of suppliers, and explicit risk assessment before outsourcing or cloud adoption. |
The Maturity Model — and Why Level 3 Is the Bar
SAMA does not issue a pass/fail certificate. It rates each member organisation on a six-level maturity scale, and the framework sets level 3 as the operating baseline. To reach a level you must first meet every criterion of the levels below it — so the path to 3 runs through real, evidenced implementation.
| Level | Name | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Non-existent | No cyber security controls — no awareness, no documentation. |
| 1 | Ad-hoc | Controls are partial or inconsistent and performed reactively, without definition. |
| 2 | Repeatable but informal | Practices repeat across the organisation but are not formally approved or standardised. |
| 3 | Structured and formalisedSAMA baseline | Controls are defined, approved, and implemented — and compliance with them is monitored. This is the baseline SAMA expects member organisations to operate at. |
| 4 | Managed and measurable | Control effectiveness is periodically measured and evaluated against defined metrics. |
| 5 | Adaptive | Controls improve continuously and are integrated with enterprise risk management. |
Level names and the level-3 baseline are from the framework text. How often SAMA re-assesses, and the depth of each supervisory review, varies by institution — treat review-cadence specifics as indicative.
The SAMA Business Continuity Management Framework
Cyber security is only half of SAMA’s resilience agenda. The BCM Framework (February 2017) requires member organisations to keep critical operations running through disruption. It is explicitly based on ISO 22301 and ISO 27001, plus BCI and DRII good practice — and it applies to your full scope, including subsidiaries, subcontractors, and third parties.
BCM governance, strategy & policy
A board-owned BCM programme: governance structure, BCM strategy, and an approved business continuity policy covering the full organisation — subsidiaries and third parties included.
Business Impact Analysis & risk assessment
BIA to identify critical processes, recovery time and recovery point objectives, and a risk assessment that drives continuity priorities — the analytical core of the framework.
Business Continuity Plan (BCP)
Documented, approved continuity plans for critical operations and services, with clear activation criteria, roles, and recovery procedures.
IT Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP)
Technology recovery for critical systems and data — alternate sites, replication, and restoration procedures aligned to the RTOs and RPOs the BIA set.
Crisis management & communication
A crisis management plan and communication procedures so leadership, staff, regulators, and customers hear the right thing at the right time during disruption.
Testing, awareness & assurance
Periodic exercising of BCP and DRP, staff awareness and training, document review cycles, and independent assurance that the programme actually works.
Who Must Comply
The CSF names its mandatory population directly. If SAMA licenses or supervises you, the framework — and the level-3 expectation — applies.
Banks
All banks operating in Saudi Arabia are member organisations under the CSF — the population SAMA supervises most closely, with cyber security and BCM expectations woven into ongoing supervision.
Insurance & reinsurance companies
All insurance and reinsurance companies operating in the Kingdom fall in scope. Policyholder data, claims platforms, and bancassurance integrations all sit inside the CSF boundary.
Financing companies & credit bureaus
Licensed financing companies and credit bureaus are named member organisations — entities whose lending books and credit data make them high-value targets.
Payment providers & financial market infrastructure
The financial market infrastructure is in scope of the CSF, and payment service providers licensed under SAMA’s payments regime are supervised against the same cyber security expectations in practice.
The first four categories are quoted from the framework’s scope on the SAMA Rulebook. TCSA is an independent consultancy: we prepare and implement, SAMA supervises — we are not affiliated with, or endorsed by, the Saudi Central Bank.
How ISO 27001 + ISO 22301 Accelerate SAMA Compliance
The CSF cites ISO among its sources, and the BCM Framework is built on ISO 22301. That is the opportunity: instead of running a SAMA project and an ISO project, we build one ISMS and one BCMS that satisfy SAMA supervision and pass ISO certification — every document and control doing double duty.
| SAMA requirement | ISO mechanism | What you reuse |
|---|---|---|
| CSF Domain 1 — Leadership & Governance | ISO 27001 Clauses 4–7 and 9–10 (context, leadership, planning, support, management review, improvement) | The ISMS governance you build for ISO 27001 — scope, policy, roles, committees, management review — is the same governance evidence SAMA assesses at level 3. |
| CSF Domain 2 — Risk Management & Compliance | ISO 27001 Clauses 6 & 8 (risk assessment and treatment), supported by ISO 27005 | One risk methodology, one register, one treatment plan — written once and presented to both your certification auditor and SAMA supervision. |
| CSF Domain 3 — Operations & Technology | ISO 27001 Annex A controls (per ISO 27002): access control, cryptography, operations security, monitoring, incident management | The CSF’s technical subdomains track Annex A closely — the framework itself cites ISO as a source — so control implementation is shared work, not parallel work. |
| CSF Domain 4 — Third Party Cyber Security | ISO 27001 Annex A supplier-relationship and cloud controls | Supplier due-diligence, contractual clauses, and cloud risk assessments satisfy both the CSF third-party domain and your ISO 27001 audit. |
| SAMA BCM Framework (all components) | ISO 22301 BCMS — BIA, risk assessment, BC strategy, plans, exercising, performance evaluation | SAMA’s BCM Framework is explicitly built on ISO 22301, so a certified BCMS delivers the BIA, BCP, DRP, and testing evidence the framework requires, almost clause for clause. |
| Maturity level 3 evidence — “defined, approved, implemented, monitored” | ISO certification audit trail: documented ISMS/BCMS, internal audits, management reviews, corrective actions | The discipline ISO certification enforces is precisely what level 3 demands — controls that exist on paper and demonstrably operate. |
Mapping is indicative — the CSF and BCM Framework contain SAMA-specific requirements (e.g. supervisory notification expectations) that an ISO certificate alone does not discharge. We close those deltas explicitly in the gap register.
“Our consultants have prepared ADIB (Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank), Mashreq Bank, and AMEX for ISO 22301 in the Middle East.”
See verified client reviews and engagement outcomes from 1,000+ audits across India, USA, UK, Australia and UAE.
SAMA CSF vs the NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls
Saudi Arabia runs two major cyber regimes. The National Cybersecurity Authority (NCA) issues the Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC-1:2018, updated as ECC-2:2024) as the kingdom-wide baseline — originally for government entities and critical national infrastructure, with the 2024 update broadening its reach. Its domains span governance, defence, resilience, third-party and cloud security, and industrial control systems.
SAMA’s CSF is the financial-sector regime, and it is more prescriptive where it counts for a bank or insurer — cyber security strategy, risk management, and third-party security. If SAMA regulates you, the CSF is your primary obligation. Where NCA applicability also reaches you, we map the same control set to both frameworks so a single implementation answers two regulators.
Not a SAMA-regulated entity?
If you are a Saudi government body, CNI operator, or a private company in the NCA’s expanded scope, your baseline is the NCA ECC rather than the SAMA CSF. The build path is similar: an ISO 27001-aligned ISMS covers the bulk of ECC domains, and we close the ECC-specific deltas on top.
Discuss NCA ECC readinessFrom Gap Assessment to Level 3 in 10–16 Weeks
One engagement, two outcomes: a SAMA-defensible maturity posture and — if you want the certificates — ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 audit readiness from the same work.
| Phase | Timeline | What we deliver |
|---|---|---|
| Scoping & maturity gap assessment | Weeks 1–3 | Current-state maturity rating across all four CSF domains and every BCM component, plus a gap register against level 3 with owners and effort estimates. |
| Design & documentation | Weeks 3–8 | ISMS and BCMS built together — policy suite mapped to CSF subdomains, risk assessment and treatment plan, BIA, BC strategy, BCP and IT DRP drafting. |
| Implementation & evidence | Weeks 8–14 | Control rollout with your teams: access reviews, monitoring, incident and change procedures, third-party reviews, BCP/DRP exercising — building the monitored-compliance trail level 3 requires. |
| Assurance & audit support | Weeks 14–16 | Internal audit, management review, SAMA self-assessment preparation, and — if you choose to certify — coordination of the ISO 27001 / ISO 22301 certification audits. |
- Consulting fee: fixed and all-inclusive, quoted after a short scoping call (in SAR or USD for Gulf engagements). Certification-body fees for ISO 27001/22301, if you choose to certify, are billed separately.
- Timeline assumes a mid-size institution starting from partial maturity. Large banks, or a target of level 4 in critical domains, extend the implementation phase — we confirm both at scoping.
TCSA prepares and implements, while SAMA supervises and assesses. TCSA is not affiliated with, appointed by, or endorsed by the Saudi Central Bank or the NCA.
In their words.
Quotes verbatim from G2. Company names added where the client confirmed them.
Instead of simply providing generic templates or checklists, their team took the time to understand our environment and requirements.
The team’s willingness to work with us and ease of communication.
They delivered the project with speed, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness.
My only regret is that we didn’t engage them sooner in our compliance journey, which would have saved us even more time.
They were always responsive and willing to go the extra mile whenever we had questions or needed guidance.
Managing the auditor relationship on our behalf was especially valuable — it took a lot of pressure off our internal team.
Their focus on ensuring that we were genuinely audit-ready rather than simply completing documentation.
The guidance was not generic or simply based on a standard checklist — they suggested practical approaches that made sense for our business.
What I like best is the hands-on support and clear guidance throughout the SOC 1 and SOC 2 process.
SAMA Compliance — Frequently Asked Questions
Straight answers on the CSF, the BCM Framework, maturity levels, and how ISO 27001/22301 fit — from a team with a banking-grade BCM record in the Gulf.
What is the SAMA Cyber Security Framework (CSF)?
Who must comply with the SAMA CSF and BCM Framework?
What maturity level does SAMA require?
How is the SAMA CSF different from ISO 27001?
How does the SAMA CSF relate to the NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC)?
How long does SAMA compliance take, and how is it priced?
Related Reading
ISO 22301 Overview
What a BCMS is, who demands it, and how certification works.
Read moreRegulator Mapping
One BCMS mapped to CBUAE, SAMA, APRA CPS 230 and DORA.
Read moreNESA IAS (UAE)
The UAE's Information Assurance Standards — 188 controls, mapped to ISO 27001.
Read moreMiddle East — UAE & Saudi Arabia
How we serve Gulf banks, vendors and enterprises, remote + on-site.
Read moreISO 27001 Overview
The ISMS standard — the baseline certificate global buyers ask for.
Read moreOperational Resilience Consulting
One ISO 22301-grade BCMS that answers CBUAE, SAMA, CPS 230 and DORA.
Read moreWalk Into Your Next SAMA Review
at Level 3
One build: a CSF maturity posture you can defend to the regulator, a BCM programme that survives a real disruption, and ISO 27001/22301 certificates from the same evidence. Start with a readiness assessment.
SAMA CSF & BCM Frameworks · Serving the GCC, India, USA & UK

